午夜性刺激在线观看免费,全免费A级毛片免费看无码,国产精品亚洲一区二区三区久久,亚洲精品无码久久久久,国产三区在线成人AV,亚洲乱码一区二区三区在线欧美,国产一区二区视频在线播放,久久亚洲精品无码观看不卡,精品九九人人做人人爱,少妇人妻无码精品视频app

向右滑動(dòng):上一篇 向左滑動(dòng):下一篇 我知道了
廣告

甲骨文告Google侵權(quán),或殃及Android

就像是Java之父James Gosling所說的,Google確實(shí)看來復(fù)制了一部分的Java 。Google顯然是有冠冕堂皇的理由,認(rèn)為他們不需要取得授權(quán),但該公司與眾多Android追隨者在現(xiàn)階段恐怕還無法遠(yuǎn)離威脅。

Google似乎暫時(shí)阻擋了甲骨文(Oracle)控告其侵權(quán)案可能對(duì) Android 操作系統(tǒng)帶來的毀滅性沖擊,但這場戰(zhàn)役還未結(jié)束。 收購了升陽(Sun Microsystems)的甲骨文向美國法院控告Google侵犯Java版權(quán)與專利權(quán),并要求至少10億美元的損害賠償金,以及對(duì) Android 的禁制令;這場官司也讓銷售Android系統(tǒng)的人們,擔(dān)心未來可能得支付權(quán)利金給甲骨文。 隨著近日陪審團(tuán)部分決議(partial decision)的提出,產(chǎn)業(yè)界對(duì)于Google可能會(huì)大幅修訂Android的恐懼看來已經(jīng)消散大半;陪審團(tuán)表示,Google確實(shí)侵害了37個(gè) Java應(yīng)用程序接口(API)的版權(quán),但無法認(rèn)定上述侵權(quán)是否在美國著作權(quán)法之公平使用原則(fair use term)的范圍中。 如同所有的法律訴訟案,未來還可能有更多壞消息;Google迫切要求法院重審,并期望能取得決定性的勝利,而甲骨文手上還有運(yùn)作中的專利權(quán)訴訟。不過有產(chǎn)業(yè)觀察家指出,現(xiàn)階段“仍未有任何最后決議已經(jīng)做成”,還有很多關(guān)鍵議題是有討論空間的。 陪審團(tuán)發(fā)現(xiàn),Google復(fù)制了Java中37個(gè)API的架構(gòu)、序列以及組織(structure, sequence, and organization,SSO),但“所有人都在等待法官判決一個(gè)最重要的問題,也就是一個(gè)API的SSO是否具備版權(quán)?”美國圣塔克拉拉大學(xué) (Santa Clara University)法學(xué)院教授Tyler T. Ochoa表示。 Ochoa補(bǔ)充指出:“甲骨文勝訴的唯一條件就是SSO具備版權(quán),以及Google對(duì)其的使用并不符合公平使用原則,但法官對(duì)這兩個(gè)議題都尚未做成決議?!?除此之外,陪審團(tuán)也指出Google復(fù)制了一小部分的甲骨文原始碼;對(duì)此Ochoa表示:“這部分的侵權(quán)損害應(yīng)該只有15萬美元左右,但如果法官判決SSO是具備版權(quán)的,損害金額可能就會(huì)高出許多?!?而Ochoa也表示,陪審團(tuán)的決議還包括,盡管升陽先前的相關(guān)行為可能會(huì)使人被誤導(dǎo),但Google使用其SSO的決定,與以上誤導(dǎo)行為無關(guān)。 像是Java與Android這樣的程序代碼本身的法律爭議是很復(fù)雜的,以筆者的觀點(diǎn)來看,法官要針對(duì)此案做陪審團(tuán)指示(instruction)就是件艱難的任務(wù),因?yàn)槟切枰獙?duì)科技與法律議題兩方面都有深刻的理解。 美聯(lián)社(Associated Press)對(duì)于陪審團(tuán)的決議做了不錯(cuò)的摘要報(bào)導(dǎo),不過要解釋那些決議的內(nèi)容,并理解接下來可能采取的法律步驟,會(huì)是更復(fù)雜的任務(wù)。 站在遠(yuǎn)一點(diǎn)的角度來看這個(gè)問題會(huì)比較清楚;就像是Java之父James Gosling所說的,Google確實(shí)看來復(fù)制了一部分的Java 。Google顯然是有冠冕堂皇的理由,認(rèn)為他們不需要取得授權(quán),但該公司與眾多Android追隨者在現(xiàn)階段恐怕還無法遠(yuǎn)離威脅。 歡迎對(duì)于這個(gè)訴訟案件有所了解的讀者提出在法律層面上的見解,我們也很想聽聽采用Android的原廠與應(yīng)用程序開發(fā)商的看法。 而在訴訟案繼續(xù)發(fā)展的同時(shí),筆者也想強(qiáng)調(diào),當(dāng)任何人開始揮舞著免費(fèi)開放源碼軟件大旗之前,別忘了“天下沒有白吃的午餐”這個(gè)道理;不同于微軟(Microsoft)與蘋果(Apple)的銷售模式,Google免費(fèi)提供操作系統(tǒng)的背后,是要讓其搜尋引擎與其它線上服務(wù)受到更多關(guān)注。 使用免費(fèi)軟件也是得付出代價(jià)的,甲骨文告Google的這場官司是否能證實(shí)這一點(diǎn)?讓我們拭目以待吧… 編譯:Judith Cheng 本文授權(quán)編譯自EE Times,版權(quán)所有,謝絕轉(zhuǎn)載 參考英文原文:Google lands punch in Round 1 of Oracle fight,by Rick Merritt

相關(guān)閱讀:
打造以智能電視為核心的多設(shè)備互動(dòng)應(yīng)用
Android原生支援:這樣的MIPS君心動(dòng)了么?
別老拿用戶體驗(yàn)說事,那多是廠商一家之言DWBesmc

{pagination} Google blocks Oracle's punch in Round 1 Rick Merritt SAN JOSE – Google appeared to block what could have been a devastating punch against its Android operating system in the legal suit brought by Oracle. But this battle is far from over. Oracle is suing Google for violating the Java copyrights and patents it acquired with Sun Microsystems. Oracle is asking for at least a billion dollars in damages and an injunction against Android, and it is threatening people selling Android systems that they might owe royalties to Oracle. Fears that Google might need to significantly revise Android appear to be abating following a partial decision rendered today in the first part of the case. The jury said Google did infringe copyright on 37 Java APIs, but could not decide whether or not that infringement was covered by fair use terms. As with all court cases, plenty more shoes have yet to fall. Google is pressing for a retrial, hoping for a decisive win. Oracle still has a patent suit in play. Indeed, one expert observer said at this point “nothing final has been decided yet,” and a number of key issues are still open. The jury found Google copied the structure, sequence, and organization of 37 of the APIs in Java. But “everyone is still waiting for the judge to decide the most important question in the case, which is [whether] the structure, sequence, and organization (SSO) of an API [is] copyrightable,” said Tyler T. Ochoa, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law. “Oracle wins only if the SSO is copyrightable, and the use was not a fair use, and neither of those questions has been decided yet,” said Ochoa. Among its other findings, the jury said Google copied a little bit of Oracle source code. “Damages for that copying would be limited to about $150,000 dollars, but if the SSO is copyrightable, then damages could still be much higher,” said Ochoa. In addition, the jury decided that even though Sun engaged in conduct that might have misled people, Google's decision to use the SSO was not made in reliance on that conduct, he said. If the judge decides APIs are copyrightable "it would be quite problematic," Ochoa said. "If the structure, sequence, and organization of APIs are copyrightable, then the copyright owner can demand royalties from anyone who wants to write a program that operates in the same way," he added. Like Java and Android code itself, the legal arguments are complex. The judge’s instructions to the jury were in my view a daunting assignment requiring a relatively sophisticated understanding of both technical and legal issues. The Associated Press did a good job summarizing the jury’s decisions on the multiple questions it was asked. However, interpreting those decisions and understanding what next legal steps may fall from them is a much more complex task. At a 30,000-foot view the horizon seems somewhat clear. As James Gosling, the father of Java said, Google does appear to have copied parts of Java. I’d love to hear cogent insights from any other legal or software experts following the case. I’d also like to hear what OEMs and developers using Android are feeling and doing at this point. So please chime in below. Meanwhile, the case goes on. By the way, before anyone starts waving the flag of the free open source software movement, let’s remember there’s no free lunch. Google is giving away an operating system that a Microsoft or Apple would otherwise sell so it can get more eyeballs in front of its search engine and many, many other online services. There’s a price for that free software. But that may not be determined by the Oracle v Google case.
本文為國際電子商情原創(chuàng)文章,未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。請尊重知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),違者本司保留追究責(zé)任的權(quán)利。
Rick Merritt
EE Times硅谷采訪中心主任。Rick的工作地點(diǎn)位于圣何塞,他為EE Times撰寫有關(guān)電子行業(yè)和工程專業(yè)的新聞和分析。 他關(guān)注Android,物聯(lián)網(wǎng),無線/網(wǎng)絡(luò)和醫(yī)療設(shè)計(jì)行業(yè)。 他于1992年加入EE Times,擔(dān)任香港記者,并擔(dān)任EE Times和OEM Magazine的主編。
  • 微信掃一掃,一鍵轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)

  • 關(guān)注“國際電子商情” 微信公眾號(hào)

您可能感興趣的文章

相關(guān)推薦

可能感興趣的話題

久久精品a一国产成人免费网站| 久久精品爱国产免费久久| 美女视频一区二区三区在线教室内污辱女教师在线播放| 久久国产成人午夜AV影院无码| 无码熟妇人妻AV国产精品交换| 国产激情一区二区三区APP| 国产高清一区二区三区直播| 老司机免费的精品视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻AⅤ麻豆| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 久久久97人妻无码精品蜜桃| 欧美精品精品一区二区| 无码午夜人妻一区二区三区不卡视频| 欧美日韩国产人成在线观看| 国产午夜福利精品集在线观看| 久久国产精品99精品国产| 亚洲一区二区三区乱码在线中国| 亚洲热在线免费观看一二三区| 国产又粗又黄又爽又硬| 国产目拍亚洲精品一区二区| 免费男同亚洲精品中文字幕无码| 亚洲欧洲一区二区三区久久| 日韩欧美精品一本二本道一区| 一级做a爰片久久毛片看看| 亚洲无人区码一码二码三码四码| 国产办公室免费视频观看| 在线免费播放一级毛片| 欧美国产在线观看综合| 亚洲国产AV玩弄放荡人妇| 一级毛片久久免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩女人aaaaaa毛片中文在线字幕| 麻豆人人妻人人妻人人| 精品国产自在在线午夜精品| 国产一区二区精品高清在线观看| 一区二区免费视频国产| 伊人影院国产在线视频不卡一| 秋霞2016午夜限制电影在线| 国产品无码一区二区三区在| 亚洲经典欧美日韩中文字幕| 亚洲码专区亚洲码专区| 99午夜精品一区二区三区|