午夜性刺激在线观看免费,全免费A级毛片免费看无码,国产精品亚洲一区二区三区久久,亚洲精品无码久久久久,国产三区在线成人AV,亚洲乱码一区二区三区在线欧美,国产一区二区视频在线播放,久久亚洲精品无码观看不卡,精品九九人人做人人爱,少妇人妻无码精品视频app

向右滑動(dòng):上一篇 向左滑動(dòng):下一篇 我知道了

美國(guó)人的夢(mèng):中國(guó)制造業(yè)有一天會(huì)撞墻

最近在美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)界有個(gè)很流行的理論,認(rèn)為在中國(guó)正興旺的制造產(chǎn)業(yè)很快就會(huì)經(jīng)歷“撞墻期”,就像是以出口導(dǎo)向的日本在1990年初所遭遇的。

最近在美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)界有個(gè)很流行的理論,認(rèn)為在中國(guó)正興旺的制造產(chǎn)業(yè)很快就會(huì)經(jīng)歷“撞墻期”,就像是以出口導(dǎo)向的日本在1990年初所遭遇的;支持該理論的人指出,中國(guó)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新步伐跟不上其經(jīng)濟(jì)成長(zhǎng)的速度。 但這樣的理論不僅可能內(nèi)容有誤,還有可能威脅到美國(guó)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力;其中一個(gè)原因在于,該理論支持者基本上是認(rèn)為美國(guó)政府決策者不需要有所作為,美國(guó)只要在等待中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)勢(shì)力逐漸減弱的同時(shí),持續(xù)在創(chuàng)新方面維持領(lǐng)先即可。問(wèn)題是,美國(guó)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力與大量推廣并制造具附加價(jià)值產(chǎn)品/服務(wù)的能力之間,出現(xiàn)越來(lái)越大的隔閡;至少得先弭平這樣的隔閡。 此外,以上“中國(guó)撞墻理論”的部分支持者,其實(shí)也是將美國(guó)制造業(yè)工作機(jī)會(huì)推向中國(guó)的始作俑者;這種毀滅性趨勢(shì)掏空了美國(guó)工業(yè)的根基。那些理論支持者也指出,中國(guó)過(guò)熱的房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)以及中國(guó)GDP成長(zhǎng)率趨緩,是該國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)勢(shì)力將減弱的其它跡象。 中國(guó)的國(guó)營(yíng)企業(yè)確實(shí)拖累其經(jīng)濟(jì)成長(zhǎng),其中央政府也有一些讓觀察家“難以置信”的弊?。坏灿袑<抑赋?,相較于中國(guó)中央政府控制型經(jīng)濟(jì)政策的遲滯,其省、市政府為了維持區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)作而投入大量資源,反而有更靈活的表現(xiàn)。 無(wú)論如何,就像喬治亞理工學(xué)院國(guó)際關(guān)系中心(Nunn School of International Affairs)的中國(guó)專家Dan Breznitz在最近一場(chǎng)美中經(jīng)濟(jì)與安全審查委員會(huì)(U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission)的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上所言:“我們不能坐等中國(guó)失敗?!?美國(guó)信息科技與創(chuàng)新基金會(huì)(Information Technology and Innovation Foundation)主席Robert Atkinson也在上述聽(tīng)證會(huì)上指出,對(duì)中國(guó)創(chuàng)新能力不屑一顧的態(tài)度,都是由那些所謂的“華府菁英(Washington elites.)”所挑起:“他們之中有太多人抱持根深蒂固的想法──“我們一點(diǎn)都不需要擔(dān)心,因?yàn)橹袊?guó)不會(huì)創(chuàng)新”?!?“中國(guó)若進(jìn)化到日本的層級(jí),就會(huì)遭遇撞墻期;但那還有好長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間?!盇tkinson預(yù)測(cè),中國(guó)在遭遇經(jīng)濟(jì)成長(zhǎng)瓶頸之前,還有40到50年。而 Breznitz則強(qiáng)調(diào),中國(guó)不是日本;他指出,中國(guó)的省、市地方政府有清楚的目標(biāo)與充裕資金,也立志要讓中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力超越美國(guó):“市我們?cè)撚X(jué)醒并正視這個(gè)對(duì)手的時(shí)候了,因?yàn)樗麄円呀?jīng)在眼前?!?也許人們可以爭(zhēng)辯,目前中國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人所采取的策略方向是缺乏永續(xù)性思考的;北京城嚴(yán)重的空氣污染是一個(gè)例證。此外還有中國(guó)日益上揚(yáng)的勞動(dòng)成本,也讓部分西方企業(yè)打算將制造據(jù)點(diǎn)移出中國(guó);但考量到與中國(guó)官方補(bǔ)貼與激勵(lì)措施相關(guān)的罰則,這些企業(yè)想要另覓他地建立制造據(jù)點(diǎn),恐怕不是那么容易。 與其坐等中國(guó)撞上那道理論性的高墻,美國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)界應(yīng)該要重新建立自有制造產(chǎn)能。Atkinson所領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的基金會(huì)預(yù)定在6月份發(fā)表一份報(bào)告,計(jì)劃以德國(guó)的制造工程師訓(xùn)練方法為藍(lán)本,在美國(guó)設(shè)立15座“制造技術(shù)大學(xué)(manufacturing universities)”,期望藉此重振美國(guó)制造產(chǎn)業(yè),弭平創(chuàng)新實(shí)驗(yàn)室與新產(chǎn)品/服務(wù)研發(fā)推廣之間的隔閡,也為美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)帶來(lái)新動(dòng)力。 編譯:Judith Cheng 本文授權(quán)編譯自EE Times,版權(quán)所有,謝絕轉(zhuǎn)載 參考英文原文: Will China hit a (great) wall? Don’t bet on it,by George Leopold

相關(guān)閱讀:
在世界的角度看中國(guó)這個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)體
中國(guó)不善自主創(chuàng)新,“二代創(chuàng)新”卻很拿手
走出水患陰霾,泰國(guó)努力制衡中國(guó)制造業(yè)6fQesmc

{pagination} Will China hit a (great) wall? Don’t bet on it George Leopold WASHINGTON – There’s a fashionable theory making the rounds here that China’s booming manufacturing economy will soon “hit a wall” just as did the export-driven Japanese economy in the early 1990s. Relax, the hit-the-wall crowd urges, the Chinese can’t innovate much less maintain their current pace of economic growth. Not only is this view misguided, it threatens U.S. global competitiveness. One reason is that those who espouse this position are essentially arguing that policy makers do nothing but wait for China’s economy to cool off and fade while we continue to out-innovate them. Problem is, there’s a growing gap in the U.S. between technology innovation and the ability to scale up and produce new value-added products and services. At the very least, we need to close that gap. Moreover, some proponents of the hit-the-wall theory are the same Beltway insiders who enriched themselves by helping to ship U.S. manufacturing jobs to China, a ruinous trend that has effectively hollowed out the U.S. industrial base. Naysayers also point to China’s overheating real estate market as another sign of an impending slowdown, along with a declining rate of growth for China’s GDP. It’s also true that China’s state-run enterprises are a drag on economic growth, and the failings of the central government are, as one observer says, “unbelievable.” But China watchers note that the stasis created by China’s command economy is slowly being challenged by more nimble provincial and municipal governments. Regional and local officials “are doing everything in their power to make the system work, sometimes against the wishes of the central government,” Dan Breznitz, a China expert at Georgia Tech’s Nunn School of International Affairs, told a recent hearing before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. “We should not rely on China failing.” Robert Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, argues that the dismissive attitude toward China’s innovation drive is predominantly held by “Washington elites.” “There are way too many who have this deeply held view that we just don’t have to worry” because the China can’t innovate,” he told the U.S.-China commission. China “will hit the wall when they get to the stage of Japan, which is a long time from now,” Atkinson predicts. “The Chinese can go 40 or 50 years before they get to that wall.” Breznitz stresses that China is not Japan. Municipal and provincial officials, he argues, have a clear set of goals, the money and the will to transform China’s economy in hopes of surpassing ours. “It is time that we wake up and smell the jasmine or ginger [tea] because it’s coming,” Breznitz warns. One could argue that China’s current leaders are taking the nation in a direction that is unsustainable. Beijing’s air pollution is but one example. Another is rising labor costs in China, a trend that has some Western companies looking for ways to pull their manufacturing operations out of China. But penalties related to government economic and other incentives will make these manufacturing “re-shoring” efforts difficult. Rather than wait for China to hit a theoretical wall, the U.S. must rebuild its manufacturing capacity from the ground up. Atkinson’s foundation is preparing a report to be released in June that will propose the creation of 15 “manufacturing universities” that will be modeled on Germany’s approach to training manufacturing engineers. Such an initiative would augment other efforts to revive U.S. manufacturing so that we can begin the close the gap between laboratory innovation and the introduction of new products and services that can help create a new engine of U.S. economic growth.
責(zé)編:Quentin
本文為國(guó)際電子商情原創(chuàng)文章,未經(jīng)授權(quán)禁止轉(zhuǎn)載。請(qǐng)尊重知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),違者本司保留追究責(zé)任的權(quán)利。
George Leopold
ESM China姊妹網(wǎng)站EE Times特約編輯。自1986年以來(lái),George Leopold一直在華盛頓特區(qū)撰寫(xiě)有關(guān)科學(xué)和技術(shù)的文章。除了EE Times,Leopold的作品還出現(xiàn)在《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》(New York Times),New Scientist和其他出版物上。 他住在弗吉尼亞州雷斯頓。
  • 微信掃一掃,一鍵轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)

  • 關(guān)注“國(guó)際電子商情” 微信公眾號(hào)

推薦文章

可能感興趣的話題

永久免费A∨片在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉av一区| 桃美女性感视频一区二区三区| 一本色道久久综合亚洲精品高清| 人妻少妇精品专区性色AV| 性欧美VIDEOFREE高清| 亚洲国产日韩欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲黄片无码国产精品伊人av| 欧美巨大XXXX做受l色诱久久av| 99视频精品全部在线观看| 性色av人妻无码一区| 久久思思99精品视频国产成人91精品| 亚洲欧美综合在线天堂| 午夜成人无码福利免费视频| 国产三级国产经典国产AV| 中文字幕在线人成视频| 久久婷婷香蕉热狠狠综合| 久久久久亚洲AV成人网人人网站| 亚洲性在线看高清h片| 国产AV中文字幕乱码高清| 99国产精品久久久久久久成人热| 天天搞夜夜爽aaaaa级毛片免费视频| 精品国产A∨无码一区二区三区| 一级做a爰片久久毛片A片秋霞天| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码| 美女把尿口扒开让男人桶爽| 国产精品55夜色66夜色| 久爱无码精品免费视频| 国产午夜福利100集发布| 小宝极品内射国产在线| 最新国产AV无码专区亚洲| 开心婷婷五月激情综合社区| 国产99视频精品免视看9| 双乳奶水饱满少妇呻吟| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码久久99| CHINESE熟女老女人HD| 精品无码一级毛片免费视频观看| 午夜福利国产成人A∨在线观| 最新成年女人毛片免费基地| 久久人人爽人人片av免费人成| 日韩AV一区二区三区免费看|